Like the most poorly-behaved misfit from deep in Microsoft’s Mac-challenged past, the updater first wiped out my original Office applications before discovering that there was no system software available to update on that same partition and declaring that it couldn’t complete the update.Īlthough the whole thing was fairly easy to recover - it was simply a matter of reinstalling the suite and then copying it all to the default ‘Applications’ folder before trying to update it, and then copying it back to where I wanted it - there really is no excuse for this kind of obnoxious behaviour from an installer. However, when it came time to install the first update from Microsoft, this installer did not understand that I might have made use of the option in the first installer to place my applications somewhere other than on the same partition as my system software. Try Online Counseling: Get Personally Matched All went smoothly: the applications were correctly installed on a second partition, while various support files were correctly installed on my first partition. In keeping with my practice of separating data, applications, and system software on different disk partitions, I chose a location on a second partition to install the software. Although the default is the ‘Applications’ folder of the Mac’s startup disk, the installer makes it easy to choose a different location. Well, when first installing the suite from disc, the installer offers the choice of where to install the application files. In this particular case, Microsoft issued two separate software updates during our testing period, and it was the first of these which hit us with the ‘gotcha’. Since we always use products in a real private practice setting for several months before writing reviews of them, we sometimes notice things that other reviewers might not. If you regularly publish articles in print, where submissions in Word format are the standard, or if you regularly make presentations and can’t get by with cheaper alternatives like Keynote, Office may be close to indispensable.ĭespite being very impressed with the suite overall, I experienced one unforgiveable ‘gotcha’ from the software. If your practice environment is such that you actually need all or a large part of the capabilities of Microsoft Office - and particularly if you need to exchange Office documents with colleagues or clients - this software suite can make your life a great deal easier. Yes, it’s increasingly possible to use open source alternatives to achieve similar tasks, but as much as I support open source software, the fact of the matter is that under Mac OS X, the open source alternatives to Microsoft Office run nowhere near as smoothly and cover nowhere near the same feature set as the de facto standard from the Redmond giant. Overall, Microsoft Office 2004 Professional is a real winner. System Requirements for Virtual PC for Mac Version 7.System Requirements for Office 2004 Professional Edition.System Requirements for Office 2004 for Mac Standard Edition and Student and Teacher Edition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |